by

October 19, 2012

Aquatics-Center

Image: Arlington County

Politicians and county leaders who like the $42.5 million aquatics and fitness center approved for Long Bridge Park, see the economic future in Arlington as positive. Challenges will exist, sure, but the aquatics center will not push the county over some fiscal cliff and might even help avert some dips, they say. Politicians and leaders who see a future less rosy, see the aquatics center and other projects as fiscal handcuffs--money that must be paid even if the economy takes a nose dive.

Do county voters think the economic pool is half full or half empty?

They really will not be asked, at least not directly. Neither will they be asked this November if they like the aquatics center (supporters would say they already have been asked, and agreed to it over the years of planning).

What the voters this November will be asked is to allow the county to borrow $50 million for “Local Parks and Recreation.” Most of that money will go toward the aquatics center.

To see videos of a debate between Jay Fisette and Wayne Kubicki, click below. At the Committee of 100 meeting, they debated the merits of the center. --Editor

At the Committee of 100 meeting on Wednesday, Oct. 10, longtime conservative Arlington activist Wayne Kubicki took the decidedly "half empty" view.

He looked toward the horizon and saw gloom: federal sequestration this January would force across-the-board cuts in government spending which would adversely affect Arlington because our economy is so closely tied to the federal government. The General Services Administration rents a lot of office space in Arlington but is consolidating and renting less. Another major renter, the National Science Foundation, might move. Fairfax County will be developing more office space along metro’s Silver Line, drawing renters out of the county and driving down Arlington rents with a glut of floor space. Money will be needed to fund new schools as the system finds room for about 7,000 new students. In all, he found about $12 million dollars that Arlington could lose from its budget.

To commit to building and maintaining an aquatics center at this time is foolish, he said.

At the same meeting county board member Jay Fisette countered that despite the economic crash of 2008, Arlington has maintained one of the lowest unemployment rates (about 3 percent now) and has maintained the highest financial ratings among the bond rating agencies. This means that Arlington borrows money at exceptionally low rates--2.7 percent at the last issuance. When other communities shrank back and cut across the board in 2008, Arlington cut judiciously and is now in a great position to act on the aquatics center, Fisette said.

by

October 19, 2012

Do you like this?

Comments (8)

Comment Feed

Bond Issues

Arlington voters are officially idiots when it comes to these bond issue votes. How over 60% of people can vote yes to this pool and over 70% can support the Streetcar spending is beyond me.

Scott 224 days ago

Failure on the way

The facility is poorly located and will be inconvenient for most country residents to reach on a regular basis. This is a gold-plated white elephant that few people will choose to use. If you live in North Arlington are you really going to spend 30 minutes in traffic when there are multiple fitness centers or existing community centers nearby?

I guess Arlington is going to repeat the same mistake it made with the Artisphere in Ballston, only this time it will be an $80 M mistake. Our delusional county leaders are once again spending our precious tax dollars like drunken sailors. It's laughable to think that this facility will somehow make the county a more attractive place to live. How about spending half of that money to upgrade existing community centers instead.

Paul 228 days ago

Alternatives exist

Building 5-10 pools at the high schools and middle schools would be cheaper and get more use.

Sam 230 days ago

The difference between wants and needs....

...is taught in elementary school in Arlington. Eric, the county does not "need" to provide a place for swimming and exercise ... it wants to do so.

Moi 236 days ago

Aquatic Center NOT Needed

County Government didn't bother to do a survey of pools, spas, and aqua therapy facilities already in operation, being expanded, and being planned. A $35 million aquatic center has become an $80 million complex with everything but the kitchen sink. Who will be the primary beneficiaries? The corporate and commercial interests located next door to Longbridge Park. Not children! No way I will vote for the park bonds.

Ted 240 days ago

Pool is needed

All the studies and demand analysis shows the pool is needed. Children need to learn to swim and feel comfortable in the water. The county needs to provide a place for both small children and seniors can swim and get the necessary exercise.

Eric 240 days ago

It Will Gewt Worse

Spending for the aquatic Center is up to $80 million, Walter Tejada wants a massive indoor field sports center next door, another $80-$100 million. Where will it end?

Barry 240 days ago

Spending

When is enough enough with this county board (and the Arlington voters in general)? Just because a project seems "cool" doesn't mean the board and the taxpayers should approve them.

Please take a stand in this election and vote NO on the parks and rec bond question and an emphatic NO on the Transportion bond question (aka the Columbia Pike boondoggle). Take a stand Arlington voters and vote NO these bond issues for the first time in over 30 years

Scott 243 days ago

Learn media production. Engage your community.
Support the Merc! Donate Now!